Skip to content
ikIbi Kontein

Research

This project examines the politics of state claims to protect women in Nigeria. It asks how those claims are produced, translated into policy and institutional practice, and defended when the evidence of protection is contested. I am particularly interested in the different audiences these claims address, from domestic constituencies to international donors and institutions, and in the systems used to monitor and verify whether protection has been delivered.

The project therefore looks beyond the familiar question of an ‘implementation gap’ to ask who gets to determine whether a protection promise has been kept, what evidence is treated as authoritative, and what happens when official accounts conflict with other records of women’s security. These questions sit within a larger interest in accountability, gendered governance, and state legitimacy.

Conference panel discussion on the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
CRPD and human rights treaties panel

Current research

Global Autocratization in Africa

Work in progress, with Carl LeVan

A co-authored study of Russian foreign authoritarian influence and democratic attitudes in sub-Saharan Africa, with Carl LeVan. Using the Russian Authoritarian Influence dataset alongside Afrobarometer, we examine whether sustained exposure to authoritarian influence tracks with erosion in citizens' commitment to democracy. We distinguish two mechanisms: illiberal socialization, where chronic exposure gradually shifts attitudes, as in Mozambique and Cameroon, and autocratic priming, where episodic influence produces sharper movement, as in Senegal. Ghana serves as the low-exposure comparison. My sections cover the Mozambique and Cameroon cases and the analysis in R.

Conference Papers

“Performing Protection: State Gender Rhetoric and Women’s Rights in Nigeria.”

Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, September 2026.

Performing Protection examines how the Nigerian state framed the protection of women following the Chibok and Dapchi abductions. Comparing state rhetoric across two administrations, the paper traces how protection claims were constructed for domestic and international audiences and reads those claims against evidence on women’s security outcomes. It uses the two cases to examine why protection rhetoric can remain politically useful even when the evidence of delivery is contested.

Previous research

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 and the Security of Women in Nigeria's Boko Haram Conflict (2009 to 2023)

MSc dissertation

Commendation for dissertation excellence

Methods

  • Quantitative analysis
  • Survey research
  • Qualitative coding
  • Policy document analysis
  • Archival research
  • Text analysis
  • Discourse analysis
  • Mixed methods

Upcoming

  • Global Autocratization in Africa

    African Studies Association Annual Meeting · New Orleans · December 2026

  • Global Autocratization in Africa

    International Studies Association Annual Convention · Atlanta · March 2027